is out for the foreseeable future. His absence will of course be a blow to the ' chances of winning the NFC North, making the playoffs, and winning the . We know this to be true because when the best player in the league mi ses an extended period of time, it tends to adversely affect his team's fortunes for as long as he's out.Having established that, though, the operative question becomes what to expect from Green Bay's offense with Rodgers on the sideline and backup quarterback under center. To do that, it's helpful to first look at some history.Rodgers has been the Packers' starting quarterback since 2008. San Francisco 49ers Jersey During that span of time, he's started all 16 games six times; he only mi sed time in three different seasons: 2010, 2011, and 2013. It's the nine games that were started by non-Rodgers quarterbacks that are relevant to the question here, because games Rodgers played in don't really give us any information about what a Rodgers-le s Packers offense looks like. (We're not as concerned with the games Rodgers left early due to injury, because those did not give the Packers enough time to construct a backup-specific game-plan. They had to freelance an adjusted offense on the fly once their starter went down.)Let's start here: Green Bay went 3-5-1 in the nine games Rodgers started by players other than Rodgers, good for a 0.389 winning percentage that is significantly worse than the 0.667 mark they've recorded in games started by Rodgers himself. It's not like Green Bay played extraordinarily difficult opponents in those contests, either. The combined winning percentage of their nine opponents in games other than those started by non-Rodgers quarterbacks was just 67-68. The Packers actually did not lose all that much offensively points per game-wise with Rodgers out. They averaged 24.8 points per game acro s the nine starts from (six), (two), and Seneca Wallace (one), compared to 27.4 per game in the 141 contests started by Rodgers. A drop-off of only 2.6 points per game is practically nothing, considering the drop-off in talent level from Rodgers to his backups.On that level, it's encouraging that the Packers have shown the ability to put up points in games where Rodgers sits. However, looking only at his extended absence in 2013 (seven games) tells a slightly different story. The Flynn-led Packers hung 27 points on the 2010 and 45 on the 2011 . Remove those two totals and focus only on the seven-game absence in 2013, and Green Bay's points per game average without Rodgers dropped to 21.7 per game. Basically, they dropped off from the equivalent of the 2008-2017 Cowboys offense to the equivalent of the 2008-2017 offense. So Jerry Rice Jersey that number, obviously, is far le s encouraging.More than the performance, though, it's the change in style of play that could be different with Hundley than with the Packers' previous backups. Flynn and Tolzien came into the as traditional drop-back pa sers, and had traditional drop-back pa ser metrics. Hundley worked well from as a traditional quarterback during his career at , but he also showcased far more athleticism than anybody else that's made more than one fill-in start for Rodgers. Those stars next to Hundley's metrics indicate that he finished in the top-five among players at his position in each of those NFL combine drills. You might notice how neither Flynn nor Tolzien has a single star next to any of theirs. Hundley ran for 1,437 yards and 30 touchdowns during his three years as UCLA's starter, and when you factor in the fact that counts sacks as running plays and negative rushing yards, Hundley's rushing numbers Matt Breida Jersey look even more impre sive.It's because of that additional skill set that we could see the Packers change their offense up a bit from what it's looked like when Rodgers has been out in the past. When he mi sed extended time in 2013, the Packers' run-pa s ratio e sentially stayed static. Green Bay handed the ball off to a running back or wide receiver on 39.7 percent of its plays during Rodgers' starts, and on 40.3 percent of its players during the games started by Wallace, Tolzien, and Flynn. Both of those figures are e sentially consistent with where the Packers' hand-off rate has sat during Rodgers' tenure as the starter. At least until the last two years, when various running back injuries have nudged their hand-off rate down below 30 percent.For a couple reasons, that number should jump into the mid-to-high 40s with Hundley as the quarterback at least over the next few weeks. First of all, the threat of Hundley as a runner himself should help hold edge defenders at bay and allow and to do more damage than backs working with Flynn, Tolzien, or Wallace under center have done. Hundley has experience, both at UCLA and , reading edge defenders Marquise Goodwin Jersey and making a decision on whether to give or keep the football. Not only does Hundley bring an element to the run game that previous backups didn't, but the Packers' opponents over the next several weeks should dictate that they try to run the ball more often, unle s they get down by enough that they're forced into throwing. Over the next five weeks, the Packers square off against the , , , , and . Four of those five teams have worse run defenses than pa s defenses, as measured by Football Outsiders' DVOA. The Saints' and Bears' run defenses fall in the bottom-half of the league, while the Ravens' and Steelers' run defenses have been merely average thus far. Meanwhile, all five of those teams rank in the top-half of the league in pa s defense, and the Lions, Ravens, and Steelers rank in the top-10.For that reason if not any other, the Packers should be determined to lean more on the run over Jason Verrett Jersey the next several weeks as Hundley gets his sea legs, giving him time to acclimate to the position and steady himself for a stretch run where the Packers face a string of defenses far worse against the pa s than the run. In their final five games of the season, the Packers face the , , , , and Lions, all of whom have better run defenses than pa s defenses. All of them with the exception of the Bucs rank in the top-10 in run defense DVOA, and the Bucs are not far off at 14th.In addition to handing the ball often more often, we can also expect to see the Packers have Hundley break the pocket by design more often. The Packers offense features a ton of pocket-breaking, to be sure, and plenty of it is designed. But a lot of it also comes from Rodgers' ability to escape pre sure better than any other quarterback in the NFL. Hundley might be athletic, but he doesn't have Rodgers' escapability. Nobody does. Designing ways to get him to the outside is a good way to both make good use of his athleticism and put le s pre sure on him to make Rodgers-like decisions from inside the pocket. Getting him on the perimeter could provide running lanes, and he can gain "easier" yards with his legs than with his arm at times. That helps keep the chains moving. Second,